Did you know that Senator Lieberman supports tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% of Americans over real relief for working families?
Tell Senator Lieberman to support a FAIR tax cut. We need a plan to address the jobs crisis, not tax cuts that are inefficient and ineffective.
With Congress preparing to debate the future of the Bush-era tax cuts, Senator Lieberman made a stop at the Middlesex Chamber of Commerce to express his support for cutting taxes for the richest 2 percent of taxpayers:
“The more money we leave in private hands, the quicker our economic recovery will be. And that means I will do everything I can to make sure Congress extends the so-called Bush tax cuts for another year, and takes action to prevent the estate tax from rising back to where it was.”
Senator Lieberman is just plain wrong. [Click here to tell him.] Additional tax cuts for the rich are unaffordable and inefficient. Cutting taxes for the wealthiest among us will cost $40 billion in 2011, $830 billion over 10 years and up to $1 trillion after factoring in interest. This money should be used to protect and strengthen Social Security and Medicare, to create jobs, and to reduce the deficit.
The Congressional Budget Office examined 11 strategies for creating jobs and boosting our economy. The CBO found that of those strategies studied, tax cuts for the wealthiest finished dead last. Middle-income and working class families are more likely to spend the tax savings they receive. [Rich Americans Save Tax Cuts Instead of Spending, Moody's Says]
The priority should be to provide economic relief to the vast majority of Americans who need it. Working families and the middle class are hurting in this economy and need help now.
Extending the Bush-era tax cuts is yet another attack on working families. Many of the same members of Congress who were against extending unemployment benefits support of tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans.
Tell Senator Lieberman to support a FAIR tax cut. We need a plan to address the jobs crisis, not tax cuts that are inefficient and ineffective.